A New Critical Social Science Research Agenda on Pesticides

Vortrag
Sitzungstermin
Donnerstag (21. September 2023), 18:15–19:45
Sitzungsraum
SH 2.101
Autor*innen
Becky Mansfield (Ohio State University)
Marion Werner (State University of New York)
Christian Berndt (Universität Zürich)
Ryan Galt (University of California)
Brian Williams (Mississippi State University)
Lucia Argüelles (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya)
Fernando Barri (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)
Marcia Ishii (Pesticide Action Network North America)
Johana Kunin (Universidad Nacional de San Martín)
Pablo Lapegna (University of Georgia)
Adam Romero (University of Washington)
Andres Caicedo (University of California)
Abhigya Abhigya (Indian Institute of Technology)
María Soledad Castro Vargas (Universität Zürich)
Emily Marquez (Pesticide Action Network North America)
Diana Ojeda (Universidad de los Andes)
Fernando Ramirez (National University of Costa Rica)
Anne Tittor (Universität Jena)
Kurz­be­schreib­ung
This paper seeks to renew the social science research agenda on pesticides to better understand the far-reaching changes that have transformed the global pesticide complex over the past two decades.

Abstract

The global pesticide complex has transformed over the past two decades, but social science research has not kept pace. The rise of an enormous generics sector, shifts in geographies of pesticide production, and dynamics of agrarian change have led to more pesticide use, expanding to farm systems that hitherto used few such inputs. Declining effectiveness due to pesticide resistance and anemic institutional support for non-chemical alternatives also have driven intensification in conventional systems. As an inter-disciplinary network of pesticide scholars, we seek to renew the social science research agenda on pesticides to better understand this suite of contemporary changes. To identify research priorities, challenges, and opportunities, we develop the concept of the pesticide complex, which highlights the reciprocal and iterative interactions among agricultural practice, the agrichemical industry, civil society-shaped regulatory actions, and contested knowledge of toxicity. Ultimately, collaborations among social scientists and across the social and biophysical sciences can illuminate recent transformations and their uneven socioecological effects. A reinvigorated critical scholarship that embraces the multifaceted nature of pesticides can identify the social and ecological constraints that drive pesticide use and support alternatives to chemically driven industrial agriculture.